Decision Making as Output and Bounded Rationality

  The classical economics theories proceed on the assumption of rational agents. Rationality implies the economic agents undertake actions or exercise choices based on the cost-benefit analysis they undertake. The assumption further posits that there exists no information asymmetry and thus the agent is aware of all the costs and benefits associated with the choice he or she has exercised. The behavioral school contested the decision stating the decisions in practice are often irrational. Implied there is a continuous departure from rationality. Rationality in the views of the behavioral school is more an exception to the norm rather a rule. The past posts have discussed the limitations of this view by the behavioral school. Economics has often posited rationality in the context in which the choices are exercised rather than theoretical abstract view of rational action. Rational action in theory seems to be grounded in zero restraint situation yet in practice, there are numerous restra

Geopolitics of Electric Vehicles




At the dawn of 2020, India seems to be on a trajectory to switch to electric vehicles for mobility. Unarguably, mobility both intra city and inter-city pose huge challenges for policy makers.

For centuries, mobility was essentially a function of the speed of human legs and animals. Machine power touched mobility solutions only in the last two centuries or so. Horse drawn trams were all over New York even 120 years ago till the car took over. The IC engine transfigured the mobility across the world. Personal mobility as distinct from public travel got a new spur. Fascinatingly, the early cars were more electric than fuel based. Large scale discoveries of oil in the Gulf at the dawn of the 20th century in addition to the reserves in the US led to an era of cheap fuel. Private ownership of cars began to increase, US in particular. Increased competition supplemented by innovation and price drops enabled the virtuous cycle in automobile industry.

Distinctive to car as theme of urban transport in US and in general extended to rest of the world was the availability of fuel. India with its import substitution policy and top-down induced so called moral virtue of shunning conspicuous consumption put brakes on supply of cars for pretty long time. It is not that Indians did not want to own cars (controlling for income) but the supply side constraints were high relative to demand. The upshot was the presence of latent demand translating into actual sales post 1991 liberalization phenomenon.

The post 1991 phenomenon not only saw an increase in car sales but also in sales of two wheelers. Their role in social empowerment and economic development are quite understated. There was also a corollary. The vehicles required fuel and it meant India has to import fuel to keep automobile revolution running. India is short of oil and hence has to meet its demand from external sources, Persian Gulf in particular.

It led to few consequences. One, there is continued trade imbalances skewed towards imports. Implied, we often run a trade deficit. Two, given the sources of oil in the Gulf and the equations with those countries and geopolitical linkages to oil conundrum, means there is volatility in oil prices frequently and India will have to find itself at the generosities of oil producers. Given the relative monopoly nature of OPEC, and every increasing need of oil, Indian geopolitics often is potential hostage to semantics of oil supply and demand. Our internal and external policies independent of oil politics necessitate our reduction in dependence on oil as critical fuel. There is no substitute as such to oil in the immediate run. Hence a focus to switch to electric vehicles. A similar switch is already on in the railways segment where diesel electrics are being replaced by overhead electrics. As Energy internet gathers pace and energy storage progresses into next stage of its lifecycle, India may well lead the field in building and distribution capacities. It might herald significant push to India’s place in automobile value chain.

Furthermore, IC vehicles tend to be polluting and given the current trends to move to eco-friendly systems, it is being perceived right or wrong that electric vehicle are less polluting. There is some merit in the argument since electric vehicle eliminate virtually all the air pollution generated by IC vehicles.

Yet, cost benefit analysis does not suggest electric vehicle to be a significant panacea to the problems arising of mobility related environmental and geopolitical hazards. Electric vehicles need batteries to power them. Instead of hydrocarbon fuels, it is the batteries run on lithium or cobalt that become critical ingredients. Batteries represent the last puzzle in the power storage. Large scale batteries able to store power could light up cities and regions thus saving lot of electricity that gets wasted or unused in the network. These batteries as noted above run on lithium and/or cobalt. Tesla is trying to experiment with Nickel but these are early days. Hydrogen batteries too are emerging on the horizon and one is not discounting hybrids in varying degrees that seem to fill the gap in the transition period.

Like oil, lithium and cobalt too are finite reserves. Incidentally, peak lithium and peak cobalt or for that matter peak nickel might be reached faster than peak oil or peak gas. Large reserves of lithium are found in Chile, Australia, Argentina, Bolivia, China etc. Cobalt reserves are predominant in Congo, Bolivia, and Australia etc. Lithium and cobalt technology have been powered basically in China which is the largest manufacturer and user of electric vehicles. Incidentally, some accounts suggest China is shifting away from lithium and cobalt based vehicles for domestic demand and essentially using these vehicles for exports to the rest of the world. There are two arguments for it. First, most lithium and cobalt mines are apparently owned by Chinese miners. There are estimates that nearly 60% of these mines might be in Chinese hands. Given the network externalities in fuel adoption, mass usage of lithium and cobalt might drive away alternative fuel based electric vehicles. This would be perfect scenario for China to lock in their prospective customers. Given the geopolitical ambitions of China, this potentially has the magnitude to undertake a shift in global power calculus. To India, it virtually might end up in a scenario wherein a lock-in with the Gulf be replaced by lock-in with China. Handing they keys of our mobility solutions to our biggest enemy might end up in stupid geopolitics. The alternative is India increasing its presence in the lithium and cobalt mining. There were reports of some mutual interest in Bolivia. However, the uncertainties in Bolivia might be dampener to the same. Moreover, India was extremely late in the race. Unless India ups the ante and is not averse to using any political or extra-political means to control the upstream mines, there remains a prospective hostage situation.

India is essentially betting on Make in India card. It entails the battery manufacturing base shifts to India in substantial proportions. Lithium or cobalt might be raw materials but the downstream applications might happen in India thereby potentially neutralising the China card if any. If this were to be the objective, the need has to move into India as base for batteries of all kinds including hydrogen etc. and not just current lithium based ones.

There is environmental angle too. Both lithium and cobalt are polluting element. They are not air polluters but disposition technologies that exist today potentially create lot of groundwater pollution. The impact of toxicity of lithium on public health is yet to be tested and validated. Mining conditions too are poor and raise human rights issues with the same.

By all accounts, it seems EVs in the immediate future are unlikely to penetrate more than 15-20% in the best case scenario in urban mobility space. There does not seem to be major visible benefits in terms of pollution control just a likely shift from air based to water and ground based pollution. The geopolitical hazard has to be tested against the marginal benefits generated by the adoption.  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Decision Making as Output and Bounded Rationality

The Chicken-Egg Conundrum of Economics

A Note on Supply-Demand Dynamics