Posts

Showing posts with the label productivity

Decision Making as Output and Bounded Rationality

  The classical economics theories proceed on the assumption of rational agents. Rationality implies the economic agents undertake actions or exercise choices based on the cost-benefit analysis they undertake. The assumption further posits that there exists no information asymmetry and thus the agent is aware of all the costs and benefits associated with the choice he or she has exercised. The behavioral school contested the decision stating the decisions in practice are often irrational. Implied there is a continuous departure from rationality. Rationality in the views of the behavioral school is more an exception to the norm rather a rule. The past posts have discussed the limitations of this view by the behavioral school. Economics has often posited rationality in the context in which the choices are exercised rather than theoretical abstract view of rational action. Rational action in theory seems to be grounded in zero restraint situation yet in practice, there are numerous restra

Big Data and Diminishing Returns

In many industries has become the buzzword. Scarcely a discussion seems to happen without touching upon the perceived advantages of big data. Firms seem to outcompeting with each other in collecting reams of data. The question however is the effectiveness of this data. The firm’s outcomes are determined primarily by the utilization of big data rather than collection of data per se. Ferreting out big data is a challenging task. Although the big data presents a data set that shows 10X or 100X in relation to existing mechanisms, it does not necessarily convey 10X or 100X worth of increase in insight. While the implication of big data is that quantity is paramount, the returns generated do not match the quantity of data generated. Big data too is subject to diminishing returns. Experts point out, it is not per se the data that should be big, but the primary factor that counts is the diversity of data. Even if datasets may be small, the amount of richness they provide when the

Twitter, Facebook and Productivity: Are they Mutually Exclusive?

Employees would desire access to social networking sites at work places. Employers feel it as an unnecessary distraction. How do we reconcile the two?   In 2009, Nucleus Research estimated a loss of 1.5% to firms’ productivity thanks to online social networking usage. Similarly in 2010, a British research firm estimated the loss to British firms at $2.2 billion per year. This implies a trade off happens between the firm’s decision to allow employees to access social networking sites at work and the productivity of the employees. However a contrary view too exists. Writing in Wired (February 2010; www.wired .com), Brendan Koerner argues otherwise.   He feels they are essential to enhance creativity and stoke a creative mind. He feels the studies that argue the loss of productivity ignore the impact of the creative process. With the human body unstructured to maintain a constant focus on assigned tasks, periodic breaks relieve the conscious minds of the pressure to perform. This e