Posts

Showing posts with the label Indian Constitution

Decision Making as Output and Bounded Rationality

  The classical economics theories proceed on the assumption of rational agents. Rationality implies the economic agents undertake actions or exercise choices based on the cost-benefit analysis they undertake. The assumption further posits that there exists no information asymmetry and thus the agent is aware of all the costs and benefits associated with the choice he or she has exercised. The behavioral school contested the decision stating the decisions in practice are often irrational. Implied there is a continuous departure from rationality. Rationality in the views of the behavioral school is more an exception to the norm rather a rule. The past posts have discussed the limitations of this view by the behavioral school. Economics has often posited rationality in the context in which the choices are exercised rather than theoretical abstract view of rational action. Rational action in theory seems to be grounded in zero restraint situation yet in practice, there are numerous restra

Deciphering Judicial Overreach

  Article 142 of the Indian constitution provides for enforcement of Supreme Court decrees. The cause was the carriage of justice. If the victims knock at the court of justice and if justice is delivered, it has to be enforced too. Therefore, the judiciary must have the power to enforce its orders. Thus arose the need for Article 142. The lower courts while having the power to enforce their decrees are also subject to the review by their higher courts. Since Supreme Court is the highest judicial body in the country, naturally its decisions are not subject to review unless it takes up its own review. Secondly, even though justice might have been delivered on paper, it needs to be enforced on the ground. For instance, there is an eviction order, but the person refuses to leave the property. So in this context, the constitutional backing allows the judiciary to enforce its orders anywhere in India. Yet, with the passage of time, there exists a possibility of the Supreme Court overreaching