Posts

Showing posts with the label motivation

Decision Making as Output and Bounded Rationality

  The classical economics theories proceed on the assumption of rational agents. Rationality implies the economic agents undertake actions or exercise choices based on the cost-benefit analysis they undertake. The assumption further posits that there exists no information asymmetry and thus the agent is aware of all the costs and benefits associated with the choice he or she has exercised. The behavioral school contested the decision stating the decisions in practice are often irrational. Implied there is a continuous departure from rationality. Rationality in the views of the behavioral school is more an exception to the norm rather a rule. The past posts have discussed the limitations of this view by the behavioral school. Economics has often posited rationality in the context in which the choices are exercised rather than theoretical abstract view of rational action. Rational action in theory seems to be grounded in zero restraint situation yet in practice, there are numerous restra

Caselets on Leadership

A Troublesome Employee Ms. Z was a team leader managing a team of 5 members. There are targets to be achieved quarter over quarter. Any lapse would severly curtail her growth irrespective of the reasons for lapses. A new employee Ms. V joins the team. Ms. V suffers a hangover from a personal problem and thus seems least interested in work. No matter whatever task assigned to her, she is stubborn not to work. At the very least, a perception is sought to convey she is not capable of working. Ms. Z however knows V has some capabilities and perhaps pretending the personal hangover as an excuse for non-performance. She perhaps is bidding time to get a better offer. A discussion with the superior fails to yield any result. Apparently, the boss seems least interested in penalising the employee as she seems to have been pushed into the organization on compassionate grounds by somebody top in the hierarchy. The other members of the team start complaining about the non-performance of the

Pakistan and Role Model Dilemma

As one comes to terms with the horrors of the recent massacre of school children in Peshawar, What probably went unnoticed were the names of the children who either died or escaped.   Names like Osama, Dawood Ibrahim seemed common.   In a world where names are usually associated with aesthetic or even predictive powers, these names mean something. If names are meant to convey certain signals, these do certainly reflect in a way contemporary mindset of an average Pakistani.   Stephen Levitt in his bestseller, Freakonomics goes on to discuss the economics behind names. Yet, the explanation does not answer satisfactorily, the state of affairs. Incidentally, the broader theme around which Levitt’s ideas revolves around- role of incentives; might help us in some way to understand what it means.   At the heart of the society and its inhabitants is the need to achieve, urge to succeed, climb the higher layers of the power pyramid, places oneself at the apex of the profession. Yet to

Reality shows, fashion parades, cricket coaching classes, entreprenurship- what binds them together?????

What makes people attract towards reality shows? Why do you see such a craze among parents to put their wards for cricket coaching classes? We see mushrooming of cricket coaching centres each advertising that the kid is a potential IPL player? Similarly what makes a industrialist like N,R.Narayana Murthy a role model for many a family? If this is not enough, take the craze for shopping festivals and modelling contests or fashion parades. Each of these activity may seem disconnected yet a common chord binds these all. People respond to incentives. A reality show winner is a kind of role model of many others aspiring that success and the rewards that come along with that success. the chances of success are not high yet the fact if we win, we hit a jackpot make the people crazy. One will not produce a Tendulkar, Richards or Dhoni or Steyn everyday. the success and the accompanying rewards that one gets makes kids and their parents want to try hand in cricket. Along the line at certai