Decision Making as Output and Bounded Rationality

  The classical economics theories proceed on the assumption of rational agents. Rationality implies the economic agents undertake actions or exercise choices based on the cost-benefit analysis they undertake. The assumption further posits that there exists no information asymmetry and thus the agent is aware of all the costs and benefits associated with the choice he or she has exercised. The behavioral school contested the decision stating the decisions in practice are often irrational. Implied there is a continuous departure from rationality. Rationality in the views of the behavioral school is more an exception to the norm rather a rule. The past posts have discussed the limitations of this view by the behavioral school. Economics has often posited rationality in the context in which the choices are exercised rather than theoretical abstract view of rational action. Rational action in theory seems to be grounded in zero restraint situation yet in practice, there are numerous restra

Decoding the Tata Big-Basket Deal

 

The e-commerce market in India is looking for boom times. The market which for long seemed to be finding difficult to cross the Moore chasm seems to be moving to headier times. Reliance with its JioMart might shake things up like it did in telecom. It has managed to get numerous investors on board Reliance Retail and Reliance Jio. Meanwhile, there is a battle building up between Reliance and Amazon that is being fought over India in Singapore with the issue being of their rival Future Group which perhaps is facing testing times. The e-commerce market too faces network externalities. The number of apps an individual users uses in his or her smartphone is obviously limited. It is difficult to experiment with multiple shopping options. By and large barring exceptions, most users prefer to shop from one or two apps. Without doubt, it is important for an e-commerce user to be on the top of the mind recall for an individual user. Very few would be willing to experiment with multiple shopping apps. Furthermore, once the user becomes comfortable with a certain app, they are unlikely to shift. In retail industry familiarity with goods is important and thus category management plays an important role even in the physical shopping world. The same applies well in the online shopping world too. In this context, interesting games are being played out in the e-commerce industry.

 

While Reliance and Amazon are battling their turfs, another interesting news has appeared in the media. If all goes well, the Big Basket is up for grabs and in all probability Tata’s will end up buying nearly eighty percent of the share in Big Basket. Big Basket emerged some years ago to provide online shopping in fresh groceries and vegetables and over a period of time has moved beyond into other categories in the grocery business. To Big Basket, JioMart would obviously be a big threat. The models however are very different. While BigBasket is building up into a single vertical in a centralised approach similar to the other e-commerce players, JioMart is venturing into something different. It wants to be more of a Uber or Ola of e-commerce. It is planning to leverage a chain of grocery stores to deliver the household items that they would require in the quickest possible time. Amazon too has its presence in household goods segment though its economies of scope has allowed it venture far vast. While Amazon might hold on against Flipkart or others, BigBasket will have to dig hard to fight the cash rich Reliance Retail.

 

To any start-up, there are twin objectives which might turn out to be mutually exclusive in the initial period. They might be aiming at profits but higher margins at initial stage might deter customer acquisition. The second option for them would be customer acquisition and thus consolidate market share but this would mean playing on the prices thus impacting profits. Therefore, there would be this dilemma in front of these start ups. A sustained profit in the long run necessitates customer retention and thus they choose in most cases to go in for the latter. Uber, Ola, Big Basket are all in the process of customer acquisition and yet to see the profits flowing into them. The valuations of course are high given the long term prospects of these firms. The investors are bullish, once the market acquisition happens, the market shakes out consolidating in favour of the few, in all likelihood, the customers having got accustomed to these services will continue inspite of higher prices allowing higher profits for the firm.

 

As the Reliance flexes it muscles, to Big Basket, the Tata deal would be pretty good one. The valuations are believed to be $1.6 billion with the deal amount to Tatas buying around 800% of the share at 1.3 billion dollars. This would give Tatas a head start in the e-commerce market where they have struggled. Furthermore, Tata’s purchases would include the buying off all the 29% stake which the Chinese retail giant Alibaba has in Big Basket. This might prove to be smart since Alibaba might come under the government scanner at any moment of time. The deal from geostrategic perspectives might be sound as it ensures the exit of a Chinese player from an Indian market though it might be symbolic in the short to mid run. What is of critical import are the plans of BigBasket as they move beyond the grocery vertical where they have established themselves. As the CEO of Tata Sons point out, the new super-app would encompass other verticals like fashion, electronics, insurance and financial services, bill payments etc. E-commerce is evergreen candidate for economies of scope into many unrelated areas and thus to Tatas this would be a great opportunity to establish themselves in the market.

 

Big Basket reports around three million orders per day. As it expands into multiple cities over a period of time, the orders would jump even higher. A bulk of the growth for Big Basket would have happened in the lockdown period as people preferred to shop online major cities in particular. There was of course a time during that period when its services were not available but moment they were available, there obviously was scarcity of slots given the supply demand mismatches. It perhaps a shortage of labour for sometime but has picked up over the last few months. Despite the increase in orders, it is still reporting losses and unlikely to report profits in the immediate period. The gross merchandise value has hit $1 billion with nearly 20 products being sold. Fruits and vegetables of course account for anywhere between one in five to one in four of the total merchandise value. Customers by value has increased nearly three times in the post corona period.

 

As Reliance prepares deep discount market in retail, Big Basket needs sufficient war chest to gear for its deep discount retaliations. Without doubt, Amazon too would be firing all cylinders. In this context, Big Basket obviously needs a giant to back it which it gains from Tatas. Tatas too are looking for big time entry in retail and acquisition of a firm with significant market share would spare them from market acquisition from the start. It must however remain to be seen how the market will evolve and what it would mean for both Big Basket and Tatas in the long run.

 

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Decision Making as Output and Bounded Rationality

The Chicken-Egg Conundrum of Economics

A Note on Supply-Demand Dynamics