Celebrities in Politics
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
The news
emerging from Tamil Nadu is a sort of anti-climax for those who believed some
churn happening in Tamil Nadu post the entry of noted film star Rajinikanth
into politics. The much awaited entry of Rajini as he is known has turned into
a non-starter. Ostensibly on the advice of doctors, Rajini has decided not to
venture into politics. For all the suspense he had created and the air of intrigue
that was built over, it seemed everything was perhaps speculating in the air.
The forthcoming Tamil Nadu elections will be the first after the death of two
stalwarts Jayalalitha and Karunanidhi who strode over the state politics for
decades. The AIADMK was struggling with the current leadership yet to gain acceptability
while Stalin is facing his first independent test in the Assembly elections. With
the DMK having a clear edge, Rajini was expected to turn the things around and
bring about a new direction in Tamil Nadu politics. He was an outsider whom his
fans believed could turn the shape of politics long corrupted by the two
Dravidian parties. There is something fascinating about an outsider being
talked about as someone to change politics. This goes beyond Tamil Nadu.
In Tamil Nadu,
Rajini was not a typical outsider. He had interest in politics though he shied
away from entering into the same. His famous call for voting DMK-TMC alliance
in 1996 to oust Jayalalitha still gets remembered today. Yet apart from that,
he has kept away from siding with any political parties openly. He had a close
association with the BJP leadership at the centre in recent years. Yet he chose
to maintain a sort of independent line. The outsider being looked to disrupt
political system is not unusual. There are instances in the past wherein such
events have occurred. There continue to be calls for celebrity inductions to
boost party fortunes in many a state even today. Grapevine suggests that Saurav
Ganguly might join BJP in West Bengal. There is considerable speculation that
he might be the Chief Ministerial candidate in the state. The fact he hasn’t
denied the rumours of joining politics has added fuel to the speculation. In
the past ,Capt.Vijaykanth in Tamil Nadu and Chiranjeevi in Andhra Pradesh have
made forays into politics building their own party with little success. In both
the cases, their inability to sustain the party over multiple election cycles
undid their efforts despite a promising debut.
Celebrities
inducted into politics happens at multiple levels. There have been attempts by
some celebrities to form regional parties and contest the elections. Many have
proved non-starters despite interest. For instance there was celebrated film
actor who wanted to launch a new party in the sixties and the seventies, found response
among professionals but the catch was everyone wanted a Rajya Sabha seat and
nobody wanted to contest a Lok Sabha election. It will go without saying the
party died even before it was born. There is a considerable interest in the
celebrities whether from the entertainment world or the world of sports or in
the professional circuit. The theory is since there is a resonance among the
people about these well known names, it would be relatively easier for them to
capture votes and thus win elections. This theory has worked with many film
stars do winning elections including Amitabh Bacchhan in 1984 from Allahabad
constituency. Sunny Deol was fielded by the BJP from Gurdaspur since it did not
have any star candidate who could win the seat, a Congress stronghold. Many
parties do field candidates with high
celebrity quotient in seats where they traditionally are not strong. Yet success
is hardly guaranteed. For instance wrestlers like Yogeshwar Dutt or Babita
Phogat failed to find success in the assembly elections in Haryana in 2019.
Similarly, while there has been some interest among the film world in Karnataka
politics, no one succeeded. Even Ambareesh could not translate his film
celebrity status to successful stint in pan-Karnataka politics.
In Tamil Nadu,
film actors like MG Ramachandran or Jayalalitha did make it big but to call
them direct entrants from film world into the chief ministership would be
wrong. Both had long political careers. Their baptism was to say literally by
fire and they came out on top in the circumstances prevalent. On the other hand
NT Rama Rao had a great start to his political career. He came from nowhere to
win the Andhra Pradesh elections in 1983. While he had a touch with politics he
had neither contested nor campaigned previously. The lack of non-Congress parties
in the state and factional turmoil within the ruling Congress did help him in a
big way. In a market for politics, there were no takers in the mainstream
allowing a rebel outsider to make a market and cater to the political demands of
the population. in fact, it is one of the rare instances in Indian politics
wherein an upstart political party came to power in its first electoral
attempt. Rajini perhaps would have been trying to do the same in Tamil Nadu but
there remained an ambiguity about this political entry throughout. While he had
expressed an interest, it had not translated into ground level activity apart
from creating some sort of suspense.
Yet, celebrities
finding success is more of an exception than something of a norm. Instances of
Chiranjeevi or Capt Vijaykanth as illustrated above reflect instances where
they are simply unable to sustain a momentum beyond an election cycle. Many film
actors did win their first elections but faded away soon after. Amitabh Bacchan
was a disaster in electoral politics. Dharmendra served only a term before
abandoning politics. Bhupen Hazarika made an ill-advised attempt to contest the
elections. Shivarama Karanth contested unsuccessfully as an independent. Many
sportspersons were interested in politics but developed cold feet at the last
minute. To a political party, winning elections is their core activity. They need
candidates who have the quotient to win the elections. Celebrities fit that
quotient. The immediate objective is then served. It does not matter whether
the celebrity candidate adjusts to rough and tumble of politics or fades away. The
objective of the immediate electoral cycle is served. The next elections are
different ball game requiring a different strategy. Thus a case for celebrities
in politics. Yet history points towards fewer successes and more failures.
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
Comments
Post a Comment