Decision Making as Output and Bounded Rationality

  The classical economics theories proceed on the assumption of rational agents. Rationality implies the economic agents undertake actions or exercise choices based on the cost-benefit analysis they undertake. The assumption further posits that there exists no information asymmetry and thus the agent is aware of all the costs and benefits associated with the choice he or she has exercised. The behavioral school contested the decision stating the decisions in practice are often irrational. Implied there is a continuous departure from rationality. Rationality in the views of the behavioral school is more an exception to the norm rather a rule. The past posts have discussed the limitations of this view by the behavioral school. Economics has often posited rationality in the context in which the choices are exercised rather than theoretical abstract view of rational action. Rational action in theory seems to be grounded in zero restraint situation yet in practice, there are numerous restra

Economics in Practice in Work Life

 

Economics as we have noted before has numerous applications in real life. Each of those past posts that have dealt with economics in action in real life have tended to theorize the practicalities on the ground through the prism of concepts in economics. The present post too would continue to be in the series to demonstrate how economics helps in real life

 

Real Life Practice/ phenomenon

 

Economics Linkage

 

Extending maternity leaves from 90 days to 180 days is counterproductive

 

This is an argument quite a number of economists and practitioners often make. When the government of India did extend maternity leaves from 90 days to 180 days a few years ago, social media was flooded with comments on how this could be detrimental to the employment of women in the industry. Their reasoning was simple. The firms are constantly endeavouring to reduce costs. If they are faced with the prospects of paying six months of pay without work would make them reluctant to hire women. In case if they do hire, they will create hurdles in such a manner that women are forced to leave the job when they get pregnant. It is not that these are assertions without foundations. Evidence is abundant from China to South East Asia to Latin America. Many firms do retrench or rather fire women when they get pregnant. Abuse of women for getting pregnant is not unheard of. In fact as many firms source their goods from these countries, many activists protested sharply at these firms for allowing these inhuman practices to take place on the pretext of lower costs and thus lower prices. The bad name for consumerism arises out of these practices.

 

Yet there is a different story at some other level. To firms in  the technology or the knowledge sector, it might become woke issue. The firms would perhaps want to demonstrate how caring and sensitive they are towards women’s issues. They might more than glad to pay those extra three months of pay for some brownie points that might help them secure. Moreover, these are industries where physical presence might not be required. Remote working is often encouraged. In this context, the firms might very well encourage women to work from home after delivery. They might bring packages where women can work for a year or so from home in lieu of them taking only 90 days or less of maternity leave. This might actually make more women opt for this and in some ways win-win for both.

 

In reality, for those firms in manufacturing especially in the unorganized sector, women are being fired or laid off for getting pregnant. They function on hire and fire basis irrespective of the law and thus this would hardly be of any relevance. They know to circumvent rules even with 90 days of maternity leave. Therefore when the government does a cost benefit analysis, the benefits would obviously be more relative to the costs. The technology and the knowledge sector would perhaps market it is as a package to manifest woke while circumventing the barriers. For the unorganized sector, it is immaterial since they have mastered circumventing in the past too. The government sector would be the only one where this would applicable and implemented to the core. As such contrary to the expectations of the section of twitter economists, this might actually not have much of an impact on recruitment of women in the corporate world.

 

 

Assembly line production

 

When the earliest management theories built up the models of assembly line production it was actually Henry Ford who put into practice. Within no time, firms were out-competing with each other to master the practice of assembly line production.

 

In the assembly line, the product would be manufactured through a series of processes. The first outcome thus was the modularization, yet this modularization unlike today’s jargon was sequential. The product would thus go through a series of sequential steps wherein some value addition was performed leading to the final stage which led to the emergence of the production. This was true of a car or motorbike or for that matter any product that was of daily use.

 

Each sequence or step required manpower to execute the steps or the value addition. The manpower must be trained for this step. The logic was once the manpower was trained in these steps, the people involved in those steps would gain mastery. For instance, painting the car would involve people who will understand and perform the task of painting either manual or automatic. These people would only do this task because they are likely to become perfect with passage of time.

 

In economics, this brings us to the concept of learning curve. With passage of time, workers become skilled in their tasks thus improving their output. The improvement in output will increased yield thus reducing costs. If the firm aims to reduce costs, one of the ways is to leverage the learning curve. If a person is able to perform 5 steps in a day untrained, with passage of time and experience, he or she are likely to perform 10 steps a day. This is nothing but an increase in output per person to reduce average costs. Bausch and Lomb was one of the first companies to manage and leverage this concept and reduce almost upto 20% as per some quarters in terms of reducing their costs.

 

Therefore, assembly line production while improving the output of the firm was an attempt to reduce average costs. Analogous to economies of scale and scope, this was an attempt to leverage the economies of experience.

 

As we saw in the above examples, economics plays a significant role in explaining the day to day life puzzles. To reiterate once again or perhaps for the nth time, the practices have hardly any conscious linkages to the theories in economics. It is purely subconscious and often common sense. It is the economists who seek to theorize these. It is not wrong to theorize but on the contrary absolutely essential. Theories are derived from practice and perhaps in some ways lead to practice. Theories in absence of evidence from practice have little utility. In the future posts, more examples will be discussed to contextualise economics of real life.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Decision Making as Output and Bounded Rationality

The Chicken-Egg Conundrum of Economics

A Note on Supply-Demand Dynamics