Decision Making as Output and Bounded Rationality

  The classical economics theories proceed on the assumption of rational agents. Rationality implies the economic agents undertake actions or exercise choices based on the cost-benefit analysis they undertake. The assumption further posits that there exists no information asymmetry and thus the agent is aware of all the costs and benefits associated with the choice he or she has exercised. The behavioral school contested the decision stating the decisions in practice are often irrational. Implied there is a continuous departure from rationality. Rationality in the views of the behavioral school is more an exception to the norm rather a rule. The past posts have discussed the limitations of this view by the behavioral school. Economics has often posited rationality in the context in which the choices are exercised rather than theoretical abstract view of rational action. Rational action in theory seems to be grounded in zero restraint situation yet in practice, there are numerous restra

Compulsory Vaccination and Self Interest

 

Now that there is some certainty in the vaccine policy announced by the government of India, it remains to be seen how the process would be carried out going forward. The government has set itself an ambitious target of vaccinating every eligible adult in India by the end of this year. The target seems quite unrealistic especially going by the current pace of the process. The pace was picking up in April before the government decided to engage in some competitive politicking which led to the chaos and unavailability of the vaccines. Moreover, the hesitancy on the part of the government to order vaccines beforehand too played a role in vaccine shortages. The government had clearly found itself on a wrong foot when the second wave stuck. The demand for vaccines multiplied manifold but there were no vaccines. There was perhaps no homework on the part of the government to cater to such eventuality. There still exists a denial over the prospective third wave. Any derailment of vaccine process might be the undoing of the current dispensation. At the beginning of the second wave, the insensitive and crass statements by key shakers and movers in the government decision making establishment reflected the government thinking and added its bit in the image battering which the government took.

 

At this stage, the country is approaching nearly 25 crore vaccine mark. Given two doses per person, it would take more than 2.5 billion doses to vaccinate the entire population. The trials on children are on and in all probability they too would be vaccinated in the coming months. It is important for children to be vaccinated fast so that their school education resumes at the earliest and normalcy restored. This is perhaps more important in the short run than a prospective children’s wave expected sometime soon. The third wave affecting children might or might materialize but as suggested in the previous posts too, it is important not to be complacent something like on the eve of the second wave but take full precautions and ensure the children remain protected. There is of course a question on how to proceed with the vaccination process. Estimates suggests the enthusiasm to wane in a month or so once the wave subsides. The momentum might carry forward to around half a billion doses or so but beyond the same the push would have to be extra strong. The government has an option of making mandatory yet given the supply demand mismatches, the mandate might not work in the expected ways. There could be logistical nightmares in ensuring everyone vaccinated at the earliest. However, there is a need to protect as many Indians as possible before a possible strike by a third wave or maybe subsequent waves. Therefore, there is some policy trade-offs that will have to be executed in making people get vaccinated at the earliest and in large numbers. The mandatory nature might be challenged in the legal forum and potentially get itself into knots in the judicial fora.

 

While the judiciary is unlikely to stay any such mandatory orders, but the government might prefer to use the moral suasion or its persuasive powers to increase the vaccination program. There have been past posts on how certain things being made mandatory would be a better way to achieve societal welfare. Masks were one such instance. Another such instance would be the vaccines. There is a personal interest in each of the economic agents. The personal choices might tend towards not having a vaccine. There might be many reasons including fear but the choices have to be respected in the societal scheme of things. Yet each person unvaccinated would carry a greater risk of infection and in turn be a source of heightened of infecting others. Every person vaccinated would lower the risk of both getting infected and in turn infecting others. Therefore, it is evident that societal interest is favored towards achieving greater vaccination. Thereby, there seemingly would exist a conflict between those not keen on getting vaccinated, their personal choice and the benefits of vaccination which spill over to the society. In a society, if large numbers are vaccinated, the emergent herd immunity would protect those unvaccinated too. There would be an element of free riding which would be exploited by few. Yet there is no algorithm to determine who benefits without getting infected. In this context, there would uncertainty about the prospective free riders too. Therefore, it is without doubt that vaccination would have to be made mandatory or at least use moral suasion to increase the pace of vaccination.

 

Within this, there does exist a market based solution if one might term it so. Each agent has an incentive to earn their daily bread. If there were to be compulsory vaccination for them to engage in their earning daily bread, they would execute the tradeoff in terms of getting vaccinated. In other words, it is the employers who determine whether their employees would be required to get vaccinated or otherwise. As more and more firms will demand employees to get vaccinated, there would be clamor for vaccination. In essence it is about responding to incentives. The firms have an incentive to restart production for their economic benefits. In fact, economy has to be restarted and work with minimum hassles something possible if large scale vaccinations happen. Similarly, for local entrepreneurs like grocers, vegetable sellers, it is essential to get themselves vaccinated to run their business. The same holds good for delivery persons, cab and auto drivers, those working in infrastructure and other utility services, private persons engaged in utility maintenance to get themselves vaccinated to keep their offerings running. For colleges and schools, having their students and staff vaccinated would make sense. As mentioned above, the education system is something that needs to be salvaged and vaccine is the best way to do it. For those engaged in travel, vaccination could help them avoid repeated testing. Therefore, it would be in the self-interest of many a stakeholders to get themselves vaccinated or having their staff vaccinated. This is what would have to drive vaccination process, something repeated in the past too. The thing that is ailing is the constraints in supply. If these constraints are eased going forward, India might be able to increase the vaccination process thus a step towards winning this pandemic battle.

 

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Decision Making as Output and Bounded Rationality

The Chicken-Egg Conundrum of Economics

A Note on Supply-Demand Dynamics