Decision Making as Output and Bounded Rationality

  The classical economics theories proceed on the assumption of rational agents. Rationality implies the economic agents undertake actions or exercise choices based on the cost-benefit analysis they undertake. The assumption further posits that there exists no information asymmetry and thus the agent is aware of all the costs and benefits associated with the choice he or she has exercised. The behavioral school contested the decision stating the decisions in practice are often irrational. Implied there is a continuous departure from rationality. Rationality in the views of the behavioral school is more an exception to the norm rather a rule. The past posts have discussed the limitations of this view by the behavioral school. Economics has often posited rationality in the context in which the choices are exercised rather than theoretical abstract view of rational action. Rational action in theory seems to be grounded in zero restraint situation yet in practice, there are numerous restra

Opening Up the Indian Vaccine Policy

 

The second wave of the Chinese flu is not showing signs of decline. There are a few who are talking about the peak being hit in Maharashtra but there is very little evidence of the same. Maybe in the next few weeks, one could observe any decline. While there are quite a few experts who are talking about the peak being in three weeks and then a slow plateau and decline the cases, these opinions are bound to be taken with certain skepticism. The plan must be to prepare for the worst case scenario rather than the optimistic scenario. In fact, one of the drawbacks of the Indian policy making apparatus has been the plans based on optimism rather than worst case scenario. Indian vaccination approvals too was based on perhaps the minimum need to vaccinate a certain mass to break the chain. There was no realization that the chain could be broken only if all the Indians are vaccinated or at least those eligible. This has set back the process of vaccination and perhaps in some ways did aggravate the second wave.

 

The government has now opened up the vaccination process for all those who are above eighteen years of age. In addition, the government has permitted the vaccination producers to sell half their production to states or in the open market. The states have been now empowered to deal with the vaccine producers directly and negotiate on the prices. They can also push forward certain priority groups based on their requirements. In addition many hospitals too would tie up with the vaccine producers and offer vaccines at pre-declared prices. This was a step that was long belated and perhaps should be welcomed as something better late than never.

 

The policy that is being adopted is certainly pragmatic. The vaccinations in the priority age group have not taken off in the expected manner. The number of vaccinations are relatively lower. In fact, on some days, the total vaccinations are below 2 million per day which hardly does justice to a country like India. While India has been the fastest to reach certain milestones in absolute terms, the fact remains that India has to vaccinate 1.4 billion people in the shortest possible time which is no joke. Therefore, there must be a strategy that would encourage both producers as also the demand side to take the vaccinations. The government announced an accelerated policy of vaccine approvals for foreign players. As pointed out in the previous posts, these measures should have come very early. In the current round, there is a possibility of Sputnik, J&J and Novovax vaccines hitting the market relatively fast. This also would free up the Serum Institute to open up to meet its contractual obligations abroad. Thus it would be critical in terms of India’s vaccine diplomacy.

 

The government was visibly under pressure. But the government equally wanted to demonstrate that it would not bow down to the pressure. There was certainly a political angle to the state’s demand for allowing vaccines to be made eligible for all age groups. The government wanted to be seen as resisting such pressure. Moreover, the states have been poor bargainers in terms of medical equipment required so far. The states have been dependent on the centre even for medicines like Remdesivir or even oxygen. In that context, the state’s ability to negotiate for lower prices is something debatable. The centre however has decided to call the bluff. The onus now is on the states. If the centre could get the vaccines at around Rs. 150 per dose, the states would be under pressure to negotiate for similar prices. In case they do not, they might again depend on the Centre which would vindicate the stand of the Centre. The centre wanted some time before it opened up for all. Since the vaccination rates were low, it decided to engage in some drive which was more a formality in the decision to open up for the rest.

 

The government should have opened up for foreign players much earlier. In all likelihood, the players like Pfizer or Moderna might negotiate only with the Centre and would need certain pre-orders before it could get into the market. It is unlikely that they will come to India anytime soon. There was an opportunity to tap Pfizer few months back but the opportunity was lost. It does not matter who was to be blamed but the fact is India has to do with a smaller basket. As being suggested in the past posts, India needs a larger and diverse basket of vaccines to meet its increasing needs. At this moment, India should go whole hog in this regard. The capacity should increase to at least ten million doses per day. In such a scenario, it is worth to reiterate that India will need at least 10 months to vaccinate its entire population.

 

The decision to open up the market would act as an incentive to which the vaccine producers as well as major hospitals would respond in big measure. This is where they have to book the profits and in turn would result in reinvestment for higher capacity. Socialist controls would result in deterioration of situation. As such the government has done something right. At this moment there would however be a question on the vaccine hesitancy or otherwise in the younger age groups. It is not the individual hesitancy that matters but the group that matters. The age group is one which is working age group and firms would be more than keen to have their employees vaccinated. Therefore the firms would engage in drives that would vaccinate their employees and their families with some of them might do it for free. This would be the biggest driver for the vaccination process in the country. It is about the choice to get vaccinated or face a loss of job thus the livelihood. Faced with this trade-off, the choice would invariably be a no-brainer. It is a different matter that so far, the response has been muted. The hospitals themselves have not made it compulsory for their employees to get vaccinated. Similar is the case of many other government organizations including the police force. This is something that has to be avoided with the private sector. If the private sector participates in full force, India’s vaccination drive would pick up fast and set the end game for the Chinese pandemic that has wrought havoc over the last year or so.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Decision Making as Output and Bounded Rationality

The Chicken-Egg Conundrum of Economics

A Note on Supply-Demand Dynamics