Decision Making as Output and Bounded Rationality

  The classical economics theories proceed on the assumption of rational agents. Rationality implies the economic agents undertake actions or exercise choices based on the cost-benefit analysis they undertake. The assumption further posits that there exists no information asymmetry and thus the agent is aware of all the costs and benefits associated with the choice he or she has exercised. The behavioral school contested the decision stating the decisions in practice are often irrational. Implied there is a continuous departure from rationality. Rationality in the views of the behavioral school is more an exception to the norm rather a rule. The past posts have discussed the limitations of this view by the behavioral school. Economics has often posited rationality in the context in which the choices are exercised rather than theoretical abstract view of rational action. Rational action in theory seems to be grounded in zero restraint situation yet in practice, there are numerous restra

Will the Indian Lockdown Create Inflationary Tendencies?


Some studies indicate a possibility of high inflation even in the excess of 10% within the next year. The expected inflation as per the surveys seem to point towards a jump of 3-4%. Interestingly, there is a divide among the economists over the after-effects of the Wuhan pandemic. The world having locked down for more than a month has without doubt created economic disruption both through Aggregate Demand (AD) and Aggregate Supply (AS) There has been an induced halt to aggregate demand with a similar restriction on aggregate supply. Furthermore, even with the lifting of lockdown, the propensity to self-protect might make prospective consumers wary of shopping thus lower AD. At the same time, the reluctance of the workers given the risks associated with the job tasks might make them skip from work thus adding to constraints in AS. Therefore an analysis would be worth pursuing over the likely inflationary impact or otherwise of the economic shutdown caused by the Wuhan flu.

There is a school of thought that believes that the impact of the Chinese virus is deflationary. Deflation is contraction of the output, the outcome being falling prices. There is certainly a case for the same. The consumers are unlikely to spend heavily on consumption for some time to come. They are likely to reduce discretionary spending especially on what they perceive to be non-essential goods. This might hold well if there is widespread feeling that the salaries are uncertain. Further, in the current context, there is good possibility of many using their savings to factor in the possible salary losses. The business too is perhaps forced to cut down its expenditure and dip into its savings. Therefore the pick-up in consumption is likely to be slow. There are already accumulated inventories which need to be disposed of. Until the inventories are sold, fresh production will remain tentative. With most major consumption markets in the red zone, there is likely to less incentive for the firms to produce hence the fears of deflation become more real. The talk of U-shaped recovery are those who are likely to be subscribing to the deflationary school of thought.

Yet there is a converse to the story. Inflation arises of two reasons. The first is the demand pull inflation. In this case, the AD increases faster relative to AS thus a shortage ensues. This will drive up the prices causing demand pull inflation. This is accentuated when there is excess money supply and government makes no effort to reduce the money supply. In the current environment, the salaries being uncertain have eaten into the people’s savings. The government has eased the money supply with the RBI’s monetary policy being currently aimed at monetary expansion. Helicopter money is making its appearance in many parts of the world. The business and households are dependent on the fiscal and monetary stimulus that could throw the fiscal deficit off balance. The fiscal deficit thrown off balance makes government borrow money increasing the interest rates or alternatively print more money creating possible inflationary impacts. The increase in money supply might induce people to buy more but underproduction or the inability of producers to keep up with the rising AD might generate inflationary pressures. The expected V shaped curve might see a demand for AD but no corresponding increase in the same pace from AS.

Aside of demand pull inflation which is unlikely, there is an element of cost push inflation. The government might induce helicopter money to increase the money supply thus an inducement for AD. Yet the firms face hurdles in production. There is a question of employees turning up for job. The self-propensity to protect would be visible among employees too. If there is any incidence of a case in the factory or the floor, the impact could be severe with many employees abandoning the floor. The need to accommodate additional risk would entail extra wages. The workers would demand additional wages thus increasing the costs of production. Further given the migration back to their home towns, there would in all probability a shortage of labour adding to the production woes. The need to incorporate additional safety measures imply the firms have to spend more. All these reflect in the increased costs of production thus higher prices being passed to the consumers.

There is an intense competition thus a price war among many players. The consumers desire lower prices and perhaps reflect a lower marginal propensity to consume apart from demonstrating increased sensitivity to prices. An option out of this would be for the firms to pass lower prices to consumers thus taking a hit in profit margins. This leaves them with less capital for reemployment and reinvestment.

The pandemic induced global economic crisis is unprecedented. There are very few instances of global economy being impacted by a pandemic. The last time would have been the 1918-21 Spanish flu. There are little records on the economic impact and the inflationary tendencies attributed purely to the pandemic. The world had just come out of the World War –I. Most of the Europe had been bruised and nearly destroyed. Russia was emerging out the aftermath of the revolution. Germany was reeling under aftereffects of the Treaty of Versailles. Asian and African countries remained the colonies of the European powers. Therefore it is difficult to attribute the economic impact to the Spanish flu though within the decade the world was experiencing the Great Depression.

The current backdrop is of uncertainty. Unlike risk uncertainty management is about getting subjective probabilities right. This estimation differs from person to person thus fresh bouts of uncertainty. To many economists, the division of opinion between deflationary and inflationary impact is more to do with the differences in these subjective probabilities. Therefore, the policy impetus from the government would also be subject to certain vagaries. There would be no right or wrong formula. The crisis has created a scenario of shooting in the dark alley given the information one possesses. While if there is going to be inflationary tendencies it would be cost push rather than demand pull. The policy makers must watch with caution on these directions as they plan the stimulus package.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Decision Making as Output and Bounded Rationality

The Chicken-Egg Conundrum of Economics

A Note on Supply-Demand Dynamics