Decision Making as Output and Bounded Rationality

  The classical economics theories proceed on the assumption of rational agents. Rationality implies the economic agents undertake actions or exercise choices based on the cost-benefit analysis they undertake. The assumption further posits that there exists no information asymmetry and thus the agent is aware of all the costs and benefits associated with the choice he or she has exercised. The behavioral school contested the decision stating the decisions in practice are often irrational. Implied there is a continuous departure from rationality. Rationality in the views of the behavioral school is more an exception to the norm rather a rule. The past posts have discussed the limitations of this view by the behavioral school. Economics has often posited rationality in the context in which the choices are exercised rather than theoretical abstract view of rational action. Rational action in theory seems to be grounded in zero restraint situation yet in practice, there are numerous restra

Behavioral Changes, Online Shopping and Chinese Virus

 

The pandemic from China certainly has set in motion certain behavioral changes conceivably an unintended consequence of the same. The need for social distancing and the urge to avoid crowds make people think alternatively to meet their needs. Shopping is turning increasingly online so would be the food deliveries. People visit eateries to enjoy and experience. Yet the same experience for instance is to be missed given the prevailing lockdowns that have become part and parcel of life in the last thirteen months and so. The people would have to opt for the second best option perhaps, the online food deliveries. It is not that the people were not accustomed to online shopping for their grocery needs, their daily vegetable and fruit needs, their daily needs for food from eateries and of course expanding to consumer durables to books to CDs to clothes and what not.

 

The pre-pandemic online buying behavior was driven by demographics. It was generally the young who felt these things were cool and thus comfortable and thus have to be engaged in. it was more of a heft thing within the peer circles. Anyone engaged in the old sort of offline retail would perhaps be perceived to be looked down and thus would have enough incentives to opt for online shopping. The traditional crowd would more prefer to continue with the offline or physical shopping given their comfort with their medium. They were uncomfortable with the changes that would accompany in the online format. Therefore, one could safely say that the online buying behavior was more of a choice driven than a compulsion driven. It was driven by an urge to experiment, by a feeling of convenience, by a feeling to free themselves of these routing shopping chores and thus use their cognitive surplus more productively. It was not something that they had to do because there were no alternatives nor because they felt alternatives offered a poor choice.

 

Yet with the pandemic prevailing, the behavior seems to undergo a rapid change. The continuous lockdowns have created in two different extremes. The neighborhood grocery store which had been much vilified got a fresh lease of life. Since the government closed the hyper markets or supermarkets and malls, the only things that remained open were the grocery stores for the essentials. The crowd did not have too many options but opt for grocery for needs of convenience. Therefore, the essential neighborhood kirana stores once again became the preferred choice. In contrast, there was the alternative that started to find an appeal. It was the online grocery shopping. People tend to shop online as stated above for many aspects yet groceries perhaps remained low on priority in online shopping. This changed something rapidly. There was of course the given labour shortages, the online delivery system did come short. There were long waiting queues. The slots were rarely available. Many a times one would have to wait for days before finally managing to book the slot for online deliveries. This too helped the grocery stores quite a bit in terms of pulling the crowd from online to the physical format.

 

Yet when one examines the behavior, the people tend to take time to develop comfort. Once they develop the comfort, they would prefer to stick to the behavior rather than change the same. When people got accustomed to buying online, they tend to continue to engage in the same even after the pandemic fully subsides. In retail shopping, what is of importance is the category management. People should know where the goods are available. Each shop may its own merchandising plan. The customer base once it gets used to the same would find it difficult to switch to other stores precisely because of this. Similarly, the online platforms too have their own category management. The customers take time to develop comfort with the categories and the assortment provided. They tend to take time to become comfortable with the payment options available on the store. The comfort takes some time to result in. Once the comfort levels are set in, the customer is generally locked into the system and there does exist switching costs even though they appear negligible in theory. This is what would delight the retailers whether offline or online.

 

When one would examine the data maybe once the pandemic subsides and normal life is restored, one might find that the structural break would be observed in the shopping patterns pre and post covid. Such a structural break is often observed when there is an exogenous event that would transform the people’s behavior as an intended or unintended consequence. Incidentally, when the demonetization happened in late 2016, there was a structural break in payment mode on the part of the individuals or institutions. There was rapid increase in the shift towards the online payments models whether the plastic currency or digital wallets or through online banking. The launch of UPI further reinforced the same. The current round of pandemic obviously would have increased the pace of digital payments. Along with the same, there would be a structural break in terms of people shifting towards online purchases. These purchases would no longer be typical items but also through essentials which was not so covered in the earlier days. It would be interesting to see how the super or hypermarkets would tend to view the same as the post covid life begins maybe in the next few months or perhaps the next year or so.

 

The structural breaks in human behavior are a result of certain events as indicated above. These events are usually discrete and well-marked. Once the pandemic is over, there would have developed a certain comfort with the online purchases. Given the hesitancies of the past disappeared perhaps out of compulsion and maybe self-protection, the habit is likely to continue for the foreseeable future. The firms which would have made a mark in the current dynamics are likely to benefit from the continuing customer patronage in absence of any adverse event. The switching costs would be relatively higher more so out of the comfort issue rather than prices or other factors per se. The pandemic atmosphere has unwittingly created a structural break for something new industry and habit to gain critical mass altogether.

 

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Decision Making as Output and Bounded Rationality

The Chicken-Egg Conundrum of Economics

A Note on Supply-Demand Dynamics