Decision Making as Output and Bounded Rationality

  The classical economics theories proceed on the assumption of rational agents. Rationality implies the economic agents undertake actions or exercise choices based on the cost-benefit analysis they undertake. The assumption further posits that there exists no information asymmetry and thus the agent is aware of all the costs and benefits associated with the choice he or she has exercised. The behavioral school contested the decision stating the decisions in practice are often irrational. Implied there is a continuous departure from rationality. Rationality in the views of the behavioral school is more an exception to the norm rather a rule. The past posts have discussed the limitations of this view by the behavioral school. Economics has often posited rationality in the context in which the choices are exercised rather than theoretical abstract view of rational action. Rational action in theory seems to be grounded in zero restraint situation yet in practice, there are numerous restra

US Tech IPOs in the Pandemic Times

 

The year 2020 has been pretty bad for the economy across the world. The pandemic induced by the Chinese virus seemingly created havoc across countries. As countries raced to protect their citizens, the trade-off was a lock down quite severe in some of the countries. The economic activity had to halt to protect human lives and prevent the virus from spreading. While the drug companies raced to be the first to produce the vaccine, the policy makers seemed to have little option but to restrict life and freedom till such time the clouds become clear. Recession is being reported from across countries with many reporting a dip in the growth well excess of 20% signalling a possible depression. The fiscal and monetary policy both seemed to show limitations. The fiscal seemed the better of the two with government pushing in cash transfers and stimulus to households and industry alike. There is no doubt the spillovers impacted the market too. The financial markets too have taken a sort of beating though they seemed to have learnt to live with the pandemic.

 

As financial markets seek to recover from Annus Horribulus for the economy and the society, conventional wisdom would suggest not many firms would want to raise money through their public offerings. While firms were short of funds, even a movement towards prospective insolvency, funds too could not be raised. The surplus lenders too would be in a deficit in the current situation. In these troubling times, one comes across an interesting piece in the Tech Crunch on the IPOs that hit and succeeded in the US market this year. The article is available here.

 

As the article points out, to many firms, this was a year which would best be forgotten. Yet at the same time, there are firms especially in the technology sector that have received a boost. As with any business, there are firms which will capitalise on any opportunity. While the pandemic induced economic disruption did bring about damaging effects, there are firms to whom it was fertile to capture the opportunities capitalising on the human behaviour changes. As with any disruption, the human behaviour undergoes a change in its manifestation. The masks have become pretty common and people tend to prefer shopping online as opposed to the traditional brick and mortar shopping. Many of the traditional sceptics or the laggards as they are termed adopted to the new style of online shopping. In fact, the pandemic might be an event for Moore chasm to be crossed in many a sectors. In this context, a few instances of new IPOs emerging as noted in this article would be worth exploring not from the buy or sell point of view but through the prism of the opportunities they have sought to encash on.

 

There is of course an interesting case of Airbnb. It was a unicorn supposed to take the market by storm. Yet the timing could not have come worse. Given the sharp drop in travel and tourism, Airbnb would have been sharply hit. There might be instances of it being reinvented as quarantine centres. However, in the broader analysis, the pandemic is short term disruption. It is only matter of time that people begin travelling in full steam in sort of what is being described as revenge tourism. Furthermore, the business travel too would come back to normal levels within a short period of time. What might be of concern to firms like Airbnb is the quantum of surplus funds available relative to the amount being raised?

 

Among the firms which have built upon capitalising on the pandemic induced change in human behaviour is a gaming firm called Roblox. Roblox allows users to buy in-game currency to be used in purchase and access of experience, enhanced experiences and other assortments in the market place of Avataar. Apparently, the firm is targeting kids. The schooling industry is perhaps the most affected in the pandemic. One concern for parents has been to keep the kids occupied at home while they are busy at work. While work from home has been the norm, the parents have to keep the kids busy to enable them perform work in peace. Furthermore, if parents have to travel out, they need to keep a tab on kids when schools are non-functional. It is where perhaps the gaming industry might have come in handy. The gaming industry might have long term externalities but the inter-temporal choices usually are skewed in favour of the short term rather than the long term. Therefore, Roblox seems to have a good year in increasing its user base and engaging its users mostly the young. Yet as Roblox seems to argue, the revenue increases might be a discrete event and their revenues might drop in the coming months and years as the situation heads back to normal.

 

Another interesting example given is of DoorDash a food delivery firm in the US. It is apparent that the hotel business has suffered during the pandemic. People who were reluctant to order food online are now increasingly adapting it. DoorDash follows the delivery of food to the doorsteps of the customers. In the lockdown, people tend to order more and hence their business naturally went up. Similar would be another firm illustrated in the article, Affirm. The business model of Affirm is offering point of sale loans to the customers. In the booming business of e-commerce, the propensity to consume being high in the US, the firm would have capitalised on this behaviour. The idea behind the success of these firms also would point towards possible long term behavioural changes. People once they get adapted to an idea or a practice are reluctant to shift. It is possible once people get used to ordering food at home might adapt it in the longer run thus a possible shift from cooking at home or buying ready-to-eat packaged foods to ordering fresh food. The outsourcing of cooking, a traditional household activity would have got a boost but it might perhaps come with a trade-off on decline in dining out with family or friends. This would have some implications on hotel business. Similarly, the rise in e-commerce would perhaps witness a shift from the physical shopping to virtual shopping. Yet what seems undeniable is firms have moved on to the kill swiftly to carve a space and use the space to make an offering in the markets. The question of ‘revenge investment’ in the market would have to be observed as the vaccines will hit the market soon and people might tend to resume normal life.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Decision Making as Output and Bounded Rationality

The Chicken-Egg Conundrum of Economics

A Note on Supply-Demand Dynamics