Decision Making as Output and Bounded Rationality

  The classical economics theories proceed on the assumption of rational agents. Rationality implies the economic agents undertake actions or exercise choices based on the cost-benefit analysis they undertake. The assumption further posits that there exists no information asymmetry and thus the agent is aware of all the costs and benefits associated with the choice he or she has exercised. The behavioral school contested the decision stating the decisions in practice are often irrational. Implied there is a continuous departure from rationality. Rationality in the views of the behavioral school is more an exception to the norm rather a rule. The past posts have discussed the limitations of this view by the behavioral school. Economics has often posited rationality in the context in which the choices are exercised rather than theoretical abstract view of rational action. Rational action in theory seems to be grounded in zero restraint situation yet in practice, there are numerous restra

Congress and the Loss of Ahmed Patel and Tarun Gogoi

 

COVID-19, the pandemic induced by the Chinese virus continues to claim celebrity victims. In the past few days, two senior Congress leaders Tarun Gogoi, the ex-Assam Chief Minister and Ahmed Patel, the political secretary to the Congress President succumbed to the post COVID-19 complications. They were two contrasting leaders who contributed in different ways to the Congress and perhaps their loss is irreplaceable to the party in the short run. The Congress had lost Shri Pranab Mukherjee ex-President few months back and thus the woes do not seem to end. It would be pertinent to have a look at what their loss would mean to the Congress.

 

At the outset, it must be said, no one is indispensable and thus everyone have their own shelf life. Nature would have its own replacements. What Ahmed Patel was the UPA-I and II, the same role was executed in different means, but same intended ends by RK Dhawan during the days of Indira Gandhi. While the Congress would await its new Ahmed Patel, it would be instructive to look at these leaders who were perhaps in great measure, Congress’s key assets.

 

Tarun Gogoi was perhaps the last mass Congress leader in the North East. He came to power in Assam in 2001 and rebuilt the state drowned in militancy, terrorism, economic disruption, illegal immigration among many other issues. He put an end to the menace of ULFA and at least reduced the potency of many other militant groups. Though the unease and disruption of peace has not completely stopped, Assam definitely is a much better and safer place than what it was in the beginning of the 2000s. the Congress under Hiteshwar Saikia and later AGP both had failed to arrest the decline in Assam nor sort the illegal immigration issue. Gogoi did not solve the illegal immigration issue but at least he put an end in substantial measure to violence unleashed by other terrorist groups. Ironically, while he was planning a tie-up with Badruddin Ajmal for the forthcoming elections, he was unhesitant to use the fear of Ajmal being CM to draw the Hindu votes in favour of the Congress and keep in power for fifteen years. His journey might have been of an U-turn for political survival but it is unlikely that Congress will find a replacement for him soon in the critical state of Assam that also is the gateway to dominance in North-East politics.

 

Ahmed Patel was in sharp contrast to Tarun Gogoi. Through the UPA years at least 2012, Pranab Mukherjee used to be the public face of the crisis management. Pranab-da headed numerous inter-ministerial groups and co-ordinated with the alliance partners for any crisis management. It was Pranabda who finally resolved the Anna Hazare fast at Ram Lila Maidan after being messed up P Chidambaram among others. Though Pranab was a disaster on economy, his political skills remained invaluable for the Congress. Yet while Pranab was managing publicly the face of the Congress, the backroom manipulations seemed to be forte of Ahmed Patel.

 

Ahmed Patel was a protégé of Sanjay Gandhi in the Youth Congress days and later warmed up to Rajiv as well who made him a Parliamentary Secretary. Interestingly, Ahmed Patel in his long career never held any ministerial positions. He last won a direct election in 1984 riding on the Indira Gandhi assassination sympathy wave. He entered the Rajya Sabha in 1993 and remained so till his death. In fact, his 2017 elections was a pyrrhic victory barely managing to cross the finishing line in a challenge masterminded by Amit Shah himself. The way Ahmed Patel struggled in that election indicated the loss of power he had suffered in the post 2014 years. For Ahmed Patel was seemingly one of the most powerful men in the political circuit just three years before. As Sonia Gandhi’s political secretary he commanded one and all. Not a single whisper could be uttered without his knowledge. Anyone who refuse to kowtow would simply be banished and face retributions. He fiercely protected the Gandhis from scandals and allegations. It was said, that once in a BJP internal meeting, it was decided to highlight the scandals of Robert Vadra. As Arun Jaitley was walking in the corridors of Parliament shortly after that, Patel accosted him and told him not to pursue those allegations. Such was his network of intelligence that he had his men and women across parties and perhaps in their most powerful bodies. Every newspaper editor and editors of op-ed pages were on his roll call and no one dared to go against the Gandhis. Any deviation would invite a swift call from Patel and an end to the so called dissent. For all the adjectives that are thrown at Modi calling him fascist etc. it was Ahmed Patel who exercised a tight lid on dissent through the power corridors of Delhi in those years of 2004-14. It was Ahmed Patel who led the witch hunt against the Gujarat Chief Minister Narendra Modi and his Home Minister Amit Shah on various cases relating to Gujarat riots and terrorist encounters.

 

Ahmed Patel dwarfed every leader in Gujarat Congress yet he was in many ways electorally irrelevant. His political fixing skills were however legendary. He was the backroom manipulator who made it possible the Uddhav Thackeray led government in Maharashtra. He was the one who managed to hold the Congress in post-2014 scenario. He was certainly not one of the favourites of Rahul Gandhi, but Rahul could not do without him. He was sidelined initially after Rahul took over as the party president, but had to soon bring him back as treasurer as the party funds ran short. Ahmed Patel used his network of industrialists to shore up the funds in the run up to the 2019 elections. He was the one who managed to diffuse the crisis in Rajasthan. He was often the man who defused crises across the states and centre through the years of the UPA. His methods might have certainly not stuck to the polite but the ends nevertheless suited the party objectives.

 

As Congress grapples with the loss of its key strategist, it would be instructive to understand how important is to groom people with understanding of political strategy. It might not be easy for the Congress to replace him. Like Anil Biswas in West Bengal Communists, Ahmed Patel played the role to perfection in Delhi for the Congress. Given the ripples or perhaps the storm the Congress is undergoing, it would certainly miss AP.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Decision Making as Output and Bounded Rationality

The Chicken-Egg Conundrum of Economics

A Note on Supply-Demand Dynamics