Decision Making as Output and Bounded Rationality

  The classical economics theories proceed on the assumption of rational agents. Rationality implies the economic agents undertake actions or exercise choices based on the cost-benefit analysis they undertake. The assumption further posits that there exists no information asymmetry and thus the agent is aware of all the costs and benefits associated with the choice he or she has exercised. The behavioral school contested the decision stating the decisions in practice are often irrational. Implied there is a continuous departure from rationality. Rationality in the views of the behavioral school is more an exception to the norm rather a rule. The past posts have discussed the limitations of this view by the behavioral school. Economics has often posited rationality in the context in which the choices are exercised rather than theoretical abstract view of rational action. Rational action in theory seems to be grounded in zero restraint situation yet in practice, there are numerous restra

Reading the Union Budget: A Primer

 

The Union Budget is without doubt, the most important document the government presents in the Parliament each year. The reasons are not too far to seek. It is the statement that expresses the government’s plan to spend on various activities as also the government’s measures to raise the revenues from the various sources to meet its expenditure. Therefore, an analysis of the budget is always going to be of critical import. The Finance Minister’s speech comprises two parts. The Part A of the speech focuses on expenditure as also on the policy intent of the government. It is in Part A that the government announces its economic policy for the year. The issues of privatization, nationalisation, expenditure on populist schemes, allocations for various social sector activities, industrial policy, disinvestment etc. all get highlighted in Part A. Part B is about the tax proposals. It has perhaps lost some attractiveness following the GST which meant that indirect taxes by and large come under the purview of the GST council.

 

While the finance minister’s speech is important for the signals it sends, the devil as they say lies in the details. The budget documents give at great length the government’s plans to spend as also the raise the revenues. It is a perusal of these documents that gives one an insight onto the real impact of the budget. Yet, as they say, the numbers are more to make up. there is of course a strong case that what matters is the broad policy direction indicated in the speech and not on those micro numbers which often are presented to square off or set off to the total expenditure. There of course also is a finance bill that accompanies the budget. The finance bill gives the legislative teeth to the government’s proposals on expenditure and tax policies. Along with the tax proposals and expenditure, the bill also contains a lot of amendments to different legislations in the domain of the finance and economic policy and at times outside the realm too. These are usually the methods of the government to pass legislation by stealth. Since the Finance Bill cannot be obstructed by the Rajya Sabha beyond delaying it, it makes the government’s efforts easy to pass such legislation where it expects will have a relatively tougher time in the Rajya Sabha.

 

Glancing at depth each of these budget documents would be painstaking. Yet one can go through the highlights to get a broad jist of what the government intends. Secondly, the an overview of the budget is presented through the Budget at a Glance. To those desirous of the bird’s eye view of the budget, this document would be sufficient. The budget at a glance begins with the revenue receipts. These are essentially tax revenues. Taxes are collected and retained by the centre in some instances. In instances like GST, taxes while collected by the centre are shared with the states. The same happens with the income tax. Therefore the net central tax revenues will form the core of the revenue receipts which also includes miscellaneous items like PSU dividends, surplus from department of posts etc. The capital receipts are the next heading in the document. The capital receipts include the loan repayments and other receipts. The latter is about the revenues earned through monetization of government assets and disinvestment of public sector. This would give insights into the disinvestment targets for the government. The tax revenues gives an insight into the buoyancy of the taxes and thus some indicators of economic growth. Thus revenue receipts in addition to the other receipts and repayment of loans will give the government what is called its own receipts. The rest of the revenues is essentially the government borrowings.

 

There are two types of expenditure the government incurs. The first is the revenue expenditure. This is incurred on day to day running of the government. These include salaries to employees to interest payments the government does during the financial year. The expenditure on various populist schemes also come under this heading. It must be noted that the revenue expenditure does not create any assets and thus no return is generated.  Unlike revenue expenditure, capital expenditure- the second type- is all about creation of assets. It is the government spending on infrastructure. The expenditure results in creation of an asset which becomes the source of revenue stream in the future. Thus it generates a return. The glance at the expenditure patterns would indicate the governmental spending. If the spending is more on revenue expenditure, it is perceived the returns would not exist and the government is spending mostly either on populist schemes or day to day running of the government. The capital expenditure is on the other hand generates returns and thus finds favour. Advocates of deficit financing believe that capital expenditure financed by debt would pay itself out and thus would generate positive returns to the economy.

 

The next question would be a gap between expenditure and revenue. If there exists a deficit, the question is on financing the deficit. The revenue expenditure must be financed through the revenue receipts itself. The revenue deficit must be zero or there must be revenue surplus in an ideal world. a presence of positive revenue deficit would indicate the government borrowings to finance its day to day expenditure like payment of salaries. The fiscal deficit, usually expressed as a percentage of gross domestic product represents the level of the government borrowings in the economy. higher deficit points to higher spending and the inability of the government to mop up revenues sufficient to meet the spending. There is of course quite a bit of debate on level of fiscal spending. There are arguments for fiscal expansion. These insights into government thinking could be obtained through a glance at the numbers of the fiscal deficit. Primary deficit is fiscal deficit minus interest payments. Primary deficit indicates the source of fiscal deficit. If interest payments are causing the deficit or in other words, the past spending resulting in present interest payments, the primary deficit would be a surplus. It would be good indicator of current fiscal discipline versus the past fiscal discipline.

 

As one goes further, there would be pie-charts highlighting the percentage share of each item under revenues as also under expenditure. These gives us insights on the sources of the revenues as also the expenditure. To a beginner this would be a good primer to start understand the budget.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Decision Making as Output and Bounded Rationality

The Chicken-Egg Conundrum of Economics

A Note on Supply-Demand Dynamics