Decision Making as Output and Bounded Rationality

  The classical economics theories proceed on the assumption of rational agents. Rationality implies the economic agents undertake actions or exercise choices based on the cost-benefit analysis they undertake. The assumption further posits that there exists no information asymmetry and thus the agent is aware of all the costs and benefits associated with the choice he or she has exercised. The behavioral school contested the decision stating the decisions in practice are often irrational. Implied there is a continuous departure from rationality. Rationality in the views of the behavioral school is more an exception to the norm rather a rule. The past posts have discussed the limitations of this view by the behavioral school. Economics has often posited rationality in the context in which the choices are exercised rather than theoretical abstract view of rational action. Rational action in theory seems to be grounded in zero restraint situation yet in practice, there are numerous restra

Demand and Supply of Money: A Primer

 

The execution of monetary policy as an instrument to direct the economy to the needed trajectory is essentially dependent on people’s willingness to use those instruments. As observed in the previous posts, the monetary policy is an indirect attempt to induce an increase or decrease in consumption or investment to the required rate using the cost of money, the interest rates as the guiding principle. By increasing or decreasing the interest rates, the objective would be to keep money supply stable while encouraging or discouraging economic agents to indulge in consumption or investment. Therefore, the context provides the backdrop for understanding money supply and the demand for money thus the foundation of monetary framework. The current note will delve deeper into these aspects.

 

The understanding would begin with the functions of money. Money has three key functions viz, the unit of account, the store of value and medium of exchange. The inability to perform the first two roles is what deters the cryptocurrencies from being accepted as currencies equivalent to the current fiat currency. The issue of currency is the monopoly of the Central Bank of the country. Thus the currency is backed by fiat. The digital currencies while being media of exchange are too volatile to be a store of value. The functions of money would lead one to decoding the underlying dynamics of demand for money and supply of money.

 

The supply of money is fundamentally, the total amount of money in the economy. It is measured through decreasing order of liquidity. The most liquid is the currency in hand. Therefore the currency in hand becomes the first measure of money supply and usually denoted by M0. Yet, this is not the only money in the economy. There are demand deposits in banks which are near liquid. There are banks which have parked their deposits with the RBI either for regulatory purposes or otherwise. The sum of currency in hand, banks deposits with RBI and demand deposits in banks constitute a form of money supply, which in India is denoted as M1. To this M1, there gets added time deposit in banks which too have certain degree of liquidity. The resultant sum gives us M3 which is the measure for money supply in India. Over recent years, other measures have been constructed around these measures. Yet for broader purposes. M3 would be the default money supply in India. When RBI seeks to target inflation within a given range through changes in interest rates, it is essentially targeting a certain level of M3. The equation of money in the Indian context would be fundamentally a direct linkage between M3 and inflation measured by CPI or WPI for a given level of GDP assuming a constant velocity of money.

 

If money supply is a function of RBI and thus a vertical curve if plotted geometrically between real interest rates and GDP growth rate, the demand for money is a function willingness and ability to use money. Understanding demand for money would entail understanding its definition and furthermore the purposes of using money. The demand for money is the willingness and ability of economic agents to hold money given the levels of interest rates, economic activity and price level. In other words, the demand for money is the tradeoff between holding money in non-interest bearing financial assets and holdings in interest bearing bonds. The demand for money is essentially an opportunity cost of holding money, a cost that is determined by the interest rates. This naturally leads to the question what are the determinants of money. The determinants of money demand lie in three different uses.

 

The first purpose of demand for money is the transaction motive. Money is medium of exchange and thus essential for undertaking transactions. Therefore economic agents use money to undertake day to day transactions and thus demand for money becomes a function of the level of transactions economic agents undertake in any given economy. While there is a demand for money for transactions, people prefer to hold money for precautionary motive too. There might exist an emergency, a rainy day, for which money might be required. Therefore it would be prudent to hold money for such exigencies. The precautionary motive often overrides the other motives during times of slump. In recent times, when economy is on a downturn following a pandemic induced lockdown, the people would prefer to postpone consumption to some future date. The uncertainty in income would deter people from engaging in what they would feel would be unnecessary consumption. During times of boom, the precautionary motive gives way to other motives. Money left to itself is idle and hence economic agents desire to earn a return on their excess holdings. Therein arises the speculative motive of holding money. The speculative motive is the amount of money holdings in interest bearing instruments. Higher the interest rates, the shift towards a speculative motive overriding the consumption and transaction motive. People would prefer to earn returns at a higher level and thus high deposit rates attract people’s attention which emerges in the form of tradeoff with transaction motive.

 

All these three motives are dynamic in nature. They are determined by the level of financial sophistication. Higher levels of financial sophistication generally leads to lower demand for money. People tend to hold less money when it is available in financially sophisticated forms from ATMs to digital wallets to online banking among others. The higher levels of economic activity would encourage a greater demand for money as transaction motive overrides the rest. Therefore, there is a positive relationship between economic activity and demand for money. Demand for money however is inversely proportional to interest rates. Higher interest rates shift the use of money from transactions to speculative and vice versa. People prefer to park their money in interest bearing instruments during times of higher interest rates and vice versa. During high inflation, there naturally exists a higher demand for money, thus a direct relation between demand for money and price level in the economy. Increasing the money supply during inflation given the already high demand for money would lead to spiraling of inflation given the inability of Aggregate Supply to match with Aggregate Demand.

 

The current post highlights the basic note for money demand and supply and thus is a primer to understanding the broader dimensions of the monetary policy and its inter-linkages with economic growth. The current discussion however is preliminary in nature and targets the basic understanding above which the detailed analysis which might follow in the posts to succeed.

 

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Decision Making as Output and Bounded Rationality

The Chicken-Egg Conundrum of Economics

A Note on Supply-Demand Dynamics