Eclipses evoke fear, mystery and
awe alike. For ancients, it was certainly a mystery. They would have been
ignorant of a natural phenomenon that does not experience a frequent occurrence.
During total solar eclipse when sun disappears and darkness abounds in the
midst of the day, they would have certainly been fear struck and panic ensued
for those few moments before the sun began to take ‘rebirth’. Given zero
knowledge of science, it would have been most likely to be attributed to super
natural forces.
Within perhaps centuries, mankind
probably make sense of eclipses as phenomenon that occur though the natural
linkages might not have been established. To some ancient civilizations, there
were astronomers who could predict eclipses in advance. Evidences of eclipses
are found in ancient Hindu scriptures and mythology like Mahabharata etc
.
Given the supernatural
attribution to eclipses, it gave rise to several theories and practices.
Astrological significance would have added to the awe around the eclipse. What
we term as superstitions today, would have made their appearance in trying to
ward off the ‘ill-effects’ of eclipses. There were rituals prescribed to ward
off the evils and the society would have followed diligently. Any errors and
perhaps even chance consequence of an ill effect would have been attributed to
violation of rituals during eclipse and thus reinforced those practices and
rites which were to be followed during and after the eclipse. Fasting, no-work,
taking bath post eclipse would have been few practices that would take root and
pass over the centuries.
With passage of time, solar and
lunar eclipses have been understood in detail. Perhaps it was in ancient India
that it was first understood. Maybe if was diffusion of knowledge or independently
discovered in the West. The modern Western theory of course makes us believe that
it was only in the Enlightenment era that scientific logic of eclipses (solar
or lunar) were first discovered.
Irrespective of the origins of
identifying the right phenomenon, people do continue to follow rituals, rites,
practices etc even today. In India, given a fundamental duty is to develop scientific
temper of mind, is it something to be promoted and fostered. The scientific
spirit was of course an invention of post Renaissance Europe whose later
mandate extended to talk down any ancient practice as stupid. India with
imperialist way of thinking was sought to be deracinated with this scientific
ideals. While scientific ideals are good, yet the idea of individual practice
of eclipse falls under ‘sincerely held belief’. These beliefs are passed to
generations for millennia and in more ways than not hardly harm anyone or
infringe anybody’s rights. As long as they follow in their personal domain, it
least matters what they do is rational or otherwise.
Yet as economists argue, it is a
rational activity. Rationality is not about adoption of ‘scientific temper’ as
defined in the Western models of thinking, but economic rationality is about an
action that one undertakes knowing the costs and benefits of the same and does
so consistently. So sincerely held belief is an outcome of rational action
undertaken consistently though it might appear at odds with so called modernist
thinking. To many, such practices might be a response to what might be termed as
‘moral incentive’ or might even be a dictum ‘caution than risk taking’!
Eclipses and the associated
sincerely held beliefs bring to the fore their own externalities and
spillovers. Since many fast during the duration of the eclipse, should restaurants
remain open or closed. In remaining open, people who might not fast during
eclipse might use it to take care of their hunger pangs yet the owner of
restaurant and the employees might have their own personal beliefs which might
compel closing of the restaurant. Irrespective of the beliefs, does the eatery
remaining open attract the customers? The footfalls might fall far below the
daily average for the said period. It brings us to the most famous chicken egg
question of economics “ Does supply create its demand?” or “ Does Demand create
Supply?”! Figure out!!
Comments
Post a Comment