Decision Making as Output and Bounded Rationality

  The classical economics theories proceed on the assumption of rational agents. Rationality implies the economic agents undertake actions or exercise choices based on the cost-benefit analysis they undertake. The assumption further posits that there exists no information asymmetry and thus the agent is aware of all the costs and benefits associated with the choice he or she has exercised. The behavioral school contested the decision stating the decisions in practice are often irrational. Implied there is a continuous departure from rationality. Rationality in the views of the behavioral school is more an exception to the norm rather a rule. The past posts have discussed the limitations of this view by the behavioral school. Economics has often posited rationality in the context in which the choices are exercised rather than theoretical abstract view of rational action. Rational action in theory seems to be grounded in zero restraint situation yet in practice, there are numerous restra

Celebrating Sunil Gavaskar

On his seventy first birthday, it would be interesting to analyse the legacy of the only genuine and successful opening batsman in Indian cricketing history, Sunil Gavaskar. To many, he represented a perfectionist and one of the first superstar batsmen in Indian cricketing world. His legacy stands magnificently though it 33 years since he last played for India. When he retired, he was at a stage where he could walk into a World Dream XI. Not just that, it would not be surprising he was picked as an opener for the all-time World Dream XI.

 

He averaged over fifty in test cricket though his one day record was far less impressive. But then he played in an era dominated by test matches with one dayers just making their appearance. He began his career for Bombay and got selected into the Indian team touring the West Indies in 1971. There was controversy at the dropping of Tiger Pataudi as the captain (selection committee chairman Vijay Merchant used his casting vote to favour Ajit Wadekar). Wadekar was the first captain from the ‘middle class’ someone outside the establishment of cricket. Till then, it was only the royalists or patronised by the royals that ensured the captaincy. Those who came from the middle class or ‘Aam Aadmi’ background were hardly given preference and often ill-treated as the examples of Subhash Gupte or Vijay Manjrekar demonstrated.

 

Though Sunny did not play in the first test, he showed in the mettle in the second with half centuries in each innings as India secured their first ever win against the West Indies. He scored 774 runs in the four tests he played thus ensuring a name in the record books. His centuries in each innings was only the second occasion an Indian batsman had done so and he would repeat two more times. In he fact he scored 705 runs against West Indies in 1978-79 thus becoming the first batsman to score 700+ runs in a series against West Indies twice. He developed a fascination of sorts for West Indies becoming the first batsman to score more than 10 centuries against West Indies, a no mean achievement in those days.

 

He might have achieved in England later that summer of 1971, a series where India won for the first time in England, but his career was underway. His performances were good in the following home series against England and later the West Indies. In 1976, in the first test in New Zealand, he stood in as a captain for the first time and won the test. In the series against West Indies that followed, he saved the test with a hundred in Trinidad. The following test too was held in Trinidad since it was raining heavily in Georgetown. At the Queen’s Park Oval, India were set a target of 404 in the fourth innings. Sunil Gavaskar’s century along with a hundred from GR Vishwanath ensured India chased it comfortably. For nearly 27 years, it stood as the highest successful chase till West Indies chased 418 against West Indies. The defeat rankled Clive Lloyd so much that he decided to adopt bodyline in the following test in Kingston where more Indians were dismissed retired hurt than getting out.

 

In 1977-78, as India toured Australia which was affected by the Packer’s series with most of their top players unavailable. Against second strength Australian side, Sunny got hundreds and played a key role though India lost 3-2 the series. In fact, Australia is one country, where Sunny Gavaskar got hundreds at all the test playing venues in the country. For all his hundreds against West Indies, he did not get one at St. Johns, Antigua where he played just one test.

 

In late 1978, India toured Pakistan, the first series between the two sides in nearly 16 years. He was the only Indian batsman to stand against the Pakistani bowlers as they wrapped up the series 2-0. It was the series that began the end of the Indian spin quartet. He replaced Bishen Bedi as captain against the home series against Packer depleted West Indies and won it 2-0. It was in England 1979 that he came with the most memorable innings 221 when India nearly chased 439 in the final innings at the final test in Oval. He secured a series wins at home against Australia and Pakistan. He was to secure one more domestic series win over England in 1981-82. This was the time he faced a lot of criticism for his captaincy. India would seek to win the first test and then all tests would meander into a draw with very slow bowling rates. Invariably test series under Gavaskar became notorious for draws. Yet in his defence, it must be said, that India having won the first test had no compulsions to opt for risk and instead opted playing safe. It was the opponents who had to do all the chasing. It might not appear to be sporting but professionalism at times is not all about sport but gamesmanship.

 

As India toured Pakistan in 1982-83, they were overawed and humbled to submission by Imran Khan. Though Gavaskar got a hundred in the series, it was not great series as per his series. He was dethroned as captain in the succeeding tour of West Indies. Kapil Dev who replaced him went to win the World Cup in 1983, something where Sunny hardly had any batting contribution. In what was billed as the revenge series, West Indies toured India in late 1983 with the pace quartet, Marshall in particular breathing fire. It was in the second test in Delhi, ostensibly under Vasu Paranjape’s advice, Sunny completely turned the tables against the Windies with quick fire 121, a dominance rarely associated with Sunny and something that reminded of Stan McCabe in Bodyline 1932. This was his 29th test hundred equalling Don Bradman’s record, which he broke in the final test at Madras with an unbeaten 236, the highest individual score by an Indian batsmen in test cricket. He regained captaincy few months later. Though he lost against England, he led India to victory in Bicentennial tournament in Australia in March 1985 proving that 1983 win was no fluke. Indian dominance in that tournament was unparalleled. Sunny perhaps knew that his captaincy was on the line and thus had announced that the tournament would be last stint as captaincy.

 

He was the master of timing, impeccable both on and off the field. He knew to time it perfectly in quitting as captain as much he did in announcing his retirement as player. He knew he played his last test against Pakistan at Bangalore in 1987 but could not announce the same. He wanted to have one last shot for a name on the honours board in Lords which he did a few months later in Bicentennial Test, post which he decided to call it a day stating the World Cup in 1987 would be his last. His last test innings a valiant 96 against Pakistan which India lost narrowly is regarded as one of the greatest test innings of all times.

 

For all his 34 centuries in tests, a record for a very long time till broken by Sachin Tendulkar, he did not have a single one day hundred till he scored one against New Zealand in what turned out to be his penultimate match. In fact, barring Gavaskar, one cannot think of any Indian player who has retired to their timing or their terms. Every Indian captain has had his captaincy taken away. They have been virtually forced to announce their retirement.  This is what made Gavaskar different as one analyses the history of Indian cricket.  He had his controversies, for instance his rather infamous walk out in MCG, 1981, a test which India eventually won. He had his differences with Kapil Dev that came to the fore in the West Indies series in 1983 and later against England in 1984-85. He had his most infamous moment in the one dayer as he scored 36 not out in 60 overs against England chasing 300+ in the opening match of the inaugural World Cup.

 

In the post retirement era, he made a name as renowned commentator and cricket writer. He coached for a short while and was the administrator for IPL on the orders of the Supreme Court. Aside of his controversies, few players have the wherewithal, talent and genius management as Sunny did. In fact, barring Sunny, there is hardly any natural opening batsman India has produced. Even Virender Sehwag despite his two test triple hundreds as opener began his career as middle order batsman. His batting was a league in its own and so was his approach to the game as a whole. As one celebrates the 71st birthday, he has carved a name among the very top in the global cricketing annals.

 

 

 

 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Decision Making as Output and Bounded Rationality

The Chicken-Egg Conundrum of Economics

A Note on Supply-Demand Dynamics