The
Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009, popularly known
as the Right to Education (RTE) Act, came into being in India from April 1,
2010 and is expected to lead to revolutionary change in the education delivery
through schools in India. RTE mandates every
child from 6 to 14 years of age has a right to free and compulsory education in
a neighborhood school till completion of elementary education. The economics of education
rests on the fundamental premise of education being an investment. Education is a good and has social benefits. But pricing of education leaves the population
groups unable to afford these fees outside the system. The market failure is
visible and the government has to step in. There are four ways in which the
government can influence the allocation of resources. In his celebrated ‘Code’
Larry Lessig presents the modes of Law, Market, Norms and Architecture to
ensure the allocation or non – allocation of a resource. Let us take each of
these in terms of education. Education is a public good that justifies no
exclusion. RTE is the government
intervention through law to ensure the provision of education across the
sections of society. Let us consider alternative scenarios.
The
market scenario can also be visualized. The government could provide subsidies
to private schools. These subsidies could be in form of reimbursing costs of
education of the children of the weaker sections of the society. Alternatively
certain tax holidays ( by and large schools are exempt from taxes anyways),
utilities being offered at cheaper rates, land being offered at concessional
rates etc could work out. Further students of well-to – families can be charge
higher (price discrimination) but these higher fees can offset by tax
concession to the parents of these children to the extent of fees paid. Student
aid facilities or even bank loans can be another method of market intervention.
Social
norms could be in the form of development of community schooling. Adult
education to certain extent has depended on social norms and this can extended
to primary schools. The social pressures on parents to educate their children
and development of community led teaching can easily inspire the growth
at-least at the primary level. The rise of open source software communities or
even wiki communities can actually be foundations for similar developments in
the education sector. This of course will be in the physical space than in the
virtual space.
With
the diffusion of computer and the internet and strengthened by the Generativity
of the PC or the internet can lead to architectural changes to the education
system. E-learning centers depending on community centers and teachers could
change the way the students are thought. The diseconomies of scale or
decreasing returns to scale present in the physical world can be eliminated in
this approach.
Yet
irrespective of the criticisms about its limitations, the Act is an attempt to
solve the fundamental question of allocation of resources given the scarcity of
the good. But alternative approaches like
social norms and architectural models can be looked to hasten the inclusive
process in education.
Comments
Post a Comment